Remember The Origins

Etymology fascinates me sometimes. I’ve been mulling over a poem, for example, about dead metaphors that are actually pretty creepy if you think about them hard. If you’ve ever trained a dog on a short leash, you’ll know what level of control it means to say a person is kept on one.

But the political season also gives us etymologies that are also revealing. Like Lee Atwater’s explanation of the origins of keywords like state’s rights, small government, and so on:

The entire social and political platform of the right in America today is basically a re-branding of overtly racist policies. It’s got a different label, but the contents are still the same.

Don’t forget where your words come from.

Metaphors Matter

Metaphors matter. They make abstract ideas comprehensible. They frame conversations – the way a picture frame sets the borders and shape of the picture it contains. They’re hugely useful, but you have to realize that they’re not perfect, and understand their limits.

Politically one of the most commonly misused metaphors is a household budget. Balancing a government budget ought to be the same, right? But it isn’t. A government has greater control over its income and a much larger time horizon than a household and that affects decisions in very serious ways. A household can spend more than it makes over the course of a day or a week and then even it out at the end of the month with no problem. A corporation usually aims to do that over the course of quarters or years. A government can do that over the scale of decades or longer. That’s a huge difference and it matters to policy and to human lives. If I refused to buy groceries today because I don’t get paid til next week, I’d go hungry for no reason. If the government refused to feed the poor this year because tax receipts are down, lots of people would go hungry for no reason. But for some reason people claim that balancing a government budget is just like balancing a household budget. You can see the similarities, but a metaphor is not a perfect mirror.

Similarly, governments don’t compete like businesses, and “we need to make our country competitive” is a hugely misleading statement. If I develop a hotel/casino (ahem) and someone else does the same thing across town, then their gain is my loss. In that situation, it makes sense to try and steal customers away from the other casino, keep their staff out, and so on.

Better to compare governments to your neighborhood. When Mr. Jones next door gets a raise at work, I’m not angry. I try not to be jealous either. I want him to succeed! We’re in this neighborhood, this world, together, but too many of the “run government like a business” types think that others must fail for us to succeed. That’s simply untrue, and a business-mindset metaphor makes it easy to believe it without even thinking about it.

Rumor has it that David Brooks and Paul Krugman have been having quite a long series of disagreements with each other, but NYT editorial policy and Serious Grownup Writer etiquette prohibit them from naming names.

So instead we get the curious phenomenon of New York Magazine offering a gloss of Krugman’s rebuttal to Brook’s case that Freddie Gray died of moral failure, when it would be far simpler to just write that David Brooks is a festering toolbag. Which of course, NY Mag is hardly the first to point out.

I can’t bring myself to read Brook’s column here, to be honest. There are so many things I would rather do. Like read the comments section on a Boston Herald article about diversity in local police forces. Seriously, you’d probably learn more there.

I interviewed a line cook about culinary school

From the SALT blog:
Culinary degrees and culinary careers are hot right now. They’re on TV with things like Master Chef, Top Chef, and The American Baking Competition. Celebrity chefs like Mario Batali and Emeril Lagasse are the old guard by now, and hip new guys like David Chang and Eddie Huang serve up foul-mouthed, back-of-the-house street cred.

But culinary school is incredibly expensive, especially for a career with notoriously low pay, terrible hours, and incredibly long odds of becoming a superstar. What are culinary school and a real cook’s job actually like?

Read the rest of the interview here.

3 Things Top-Tier Law Students Get Wrong About Money

I spoke with a financial aid officer at a top-ten law school a few months ago and wrote a piece for the SALT blog about it. It’s a basic description of common financial mistakes and ways to avoid them.

1. They Don’t Read Contracts Before Signing Them
Yes, even while passing their contracts courses, they sign things without reading them. One student came in to financial aid to ask for extra money because she hadn’t paid her electric bill all year—and owed $4,000.

Her lease specified that electricity was her responsibility, but she hadn’t read the lease, and her landlord hadn’t told her. Others sign important documents and then don’t keep copies, or don’t file them somewhere organized enough to find them again later.

How You Can Be Smarter

Double-check. Ask questions. Get answers in writing. Read documents before you file them away.

And get a file cabinet or at least a box with some folders in it. You may live in a digital era, but some paper documents you need to be able to find without Google.

2. They Don’t Match Their Spending To Their Income

Students who go straight from undergraduate life to law school are making all the same mistakes of early adulthood that others do. But they’re doing it without an income. They spend all the money they have. They eat out instead of cooking at home. They try to keep up with their income-earning friends, and they borrow too much money to pay for it.

You’d expect people who have a few years of life experience to do better, but they don’t. They are reducing their incomes to go back to school, but they are reluctant to go back to living like students again.

Both groups know they need to network and meet up with other students and participate in extracurricular activities. But those things can get expensive. Cutting everything out isn’t really an option, and it’s genuinely difficult to pick the right balance.

How You Can Be Smarter

This one takes practice. Get used to saying, “I’d love to, but that’s not in my budget.”

And spend some time looking for affordable alternatives you can suggest for student social events. For example, instead of expensive opera tickets, look into free nights at museums, book readings, or gallery openings. If your local sports team is expensive, check the minor leagues (you can get better seats anyway). If someone suggests a wine tasting, try doing it at someone’s house instead of a restaurant. You get the idea.

3. They’re Overwhelmed

There’s laundry and homework and dinner and all of life’s usual tasks, and getting your personal financial life under control demands uninterrupted time and energy. It’s even harder if you have additional family responsibilities, which is more common for graduate students.

Taking the time to gather all your financial information into one place—whether it’s a spreadsheet or Mint.com or another tool—requires some setup. But it’s important.

How You Can Be Smarter
Make an appointment with yourself and get a good look at your money. How much do you have, and how much do you owe? How much will the payments be? When will they be due?

If you’re not sure, make an appointment with the financial aid office at your school, and go over those numbers with them. Spend a few minutes a week tracking your spending and income, and you’ll be far less likely to run into unpleasant surprises.

Selection from recent comments

its fastidious paragraph concerning media print, we all be
familiar with media is a impressive source of data
Sparks fans should read the book and the term
in this real-life story
tresses stylist: “I am prospect of Lolita”
unexpectedly pay although the hair is stay calm,
the popsy’s accouter, but the entry-way is shimmery
cartel of red lip veneer and partial orange and not too brilliant.