NZX, PBR

Via the trademark blog, news that the name NZX is contested between the New Zealand Stock Exchange and a porn mag. The porn mag was first, but the exchange registered the name.

The NYT says PBR has cachet because it’s unmarketed, but I like it because it’s what the bad guy in Blue Velvet drinks. OK, also because it’s trendily bad, lightly marketed, drunk by hipsters, and cheap as all get-out. Can’t forget the price factor.

Candidates

I saw the MoveOn Democratic Presidential Candidate Slate today. My analysis:

  • Carol Moseley Braun: Would do a good job. Not a chance.
  • Sharpton: Dramatically irrelevant.
  • Dean: The Ralph Nader of 2004.
  • John Edwards: Possible.
  • Dick Gephardt: I thought this was the guy from Florida, but I was wrong. I don’t know what the hell this one’s about.
  • Graham: Too conservative for my taste, and too old, and from Florida, meaning “probably corrupt.”
  • Kerrey: Has money (I stand corrected: it’s his wife’s and she thinks politics is stupid– but he’s pretty well funded anyway). Too Northern. Possible nominee. Looks like Kennedy, which may be a good thing, or not.
  • Kuchinich: Unpronouncable, unattractive, too progressive.
  • Lieberman: Practically Republican, too old, and too close to the 2000 debacle.

Strongly Worded Letter Number Sixteen

I’m developing something of a reputation for writing strongly worded letters. Which means, I suppose, that I’m becoming a crank. For example, I doubt that the Wall Street Journal will publish the letter I just sent their editors:

Dear Wall Street Journal:

Your article Thursday about the woes of brides and of the wedding industry leaves out an obvious application of neoliberal economic policy that could spur the wedding industry and the economy as a whole. Currently, the number of marriages in the US is relatively static, and the economy has given people reason to cut back on their celebrations, putting a damper on wedding-related enterprises. To allow the industry to expand, we must deregulate it by allowing homosexual couples to marry. An increase in the number of weddings also means an increase in gift-buying, new household formation, and general consumer spending, which can provide a powerful impetus to the general economy.

Marriage deregulation is especially urgent now that Canada is pondering the recognition of gay marriages. Should Canada invite them, many gays and lesbians will flock across the border to wed, taking their dollars with them. We cannot allow the US wedding industry to remain uncompetitive in the global marketplace, and therefore must deregulate marriage as soon as possible.

Sincerely,
Aaron Weber

Beverly Package

I’ve gotten to know Montserrat station and Beverley, MA pretty well over the past few days, going out to Motorcycle Riding School to take the state-approved safety class. I failed it, which means I have to schlep my ass out there again some time in the next 14 days, pay an extra fifty bucks, and pass it this time, dammit, or else. The station is near a liquor store called Beverley Package, which I think would make a good name for a transsexual porn star.

I’m buying a 1991 Kawasaki Zephyr, which is a standard bike they don’t make any more. Smaller and sportier than the Vulcans and not as absurd as the Ninjas. Still a little larger than I need, but I’ll grow into it or die trying.

Why we need gay marriage now

Here’s my current theory: gay marriage can save the economy.

The average wedding in the US is well into the $20k range, before you start counting the gifts. If spending is good for the economy, weddings are good for the economy, and we should have more of them. However, the wedding industry is in stasis: people are getting married later, and more reluctantly.

Some in the industry blame low-cost competition but that’s not the heart of the problem. The real blocker on demand for weddings is over-regulation.

Oh neoliberals, where are you now? There’s a whole class of citizenry with oceans of pent-up demand just waiting to spend spend spend, and here are unnecessary, intrusive laws blocking the unfettered commerce of the American wedding industry. The engine of economic growth is firmly in our grasp: we have only to open the throttle!

On the other hand, maybe we need to legalize gay sex before we get to recognizing unions.