Why we need gay marriage now

Here’s my current theory: gay marriage can save the economy.

The average wedding in the US is well into the $20k range, before you start counting the gifts. If spending is good for the economy, weddings are good for the economy, and we should have more of them. However, the wedding industry is in stasis: people are getting married later, and more reluctantly.

Some in the industry blame low-cost competition but that’s not the heart of the problem. The real blocker on demand for weddings is over-regulation.

Oh neoliberals, where are you now? There’s a whole class of citizenry with oceans of pent-up demand just waiting to spend spend spend, and here are unnecessary, intrusive laws blocking the unfettered commerce of the American wedding industry. The engine of economic growth is firmly in our grasp: we have only to open the throttle!

On the other hand, maybe we need to legalize gay sex before we get to recognizing unions.

Say it with Cement

Cemex has been advertising an awful lot in The Economist. It’s funny to me to see companies that advertise there. Their classified ads tend to be of two sorts: official announcements of things like job openings at the World Institue of Econometrics, or privatizations of Rwandan banks, and then ads for “wealth preservation” with “privacy” through “offshore investments.” And of course the other ads are for luxury items and for companies that want people to invest in them and boost their share prices.

Three totally random links:
Rumors in Fargo and a woman whose death was apparently, but not actually, related to the movie.

The bared navel, much analyzed. You know, dude, I was totally all about navels before they were cool.

101 stupid business moves of the past year. Including one item that just reads “Martha, Martha, Martha.”

Postcard

I just got a card postmarked Provo, UT, with a picture of Arches National Park. It says:

Hi Aaron and Diane, Having a fabulous time. The red stone here is incredible, particularly in late afternoon… lots of lizards! v. hot- in the 90’s. On to Zion/Bryce Canyon Natl park today. See you soon, Linda.

I don’t know Linda or Diane. The card is addressed to me at my old address, sans apartment number– perhaps a different person of the same name? Perhaps a prank? We’ll see.

Sunday Sunday Sunday

Sunny out today, finally. Exercise is in order, of some sort. The desktop team will be working long hours tonight. Me, I got some thinking to do.

Not thinking about the FCC, (ambivalent: while radio’s domination by ClearChannel is an obvious negative, there are many more independent media channels now, so it no longer makes as much sense to ensure diversity with the old regulations).

Not thinking about WMD (again, ambivalent: I’m guessing Bush and his crew are guilty of willful ignorance rather than deliberate falsehood, but I’m not sure that’s much of an excuse. And of course it’s done now, maybe even for the better, and we’re going to need to put more boots on the ground before we get out of Iraq safely, and if we get peace between Israel and Palestine we’ll be better off than before).

Not thinking about motorcycles, despite the obvious attraction of my hot new class-M learner’s permit.

I need to do hard thinking about me, and what I mean to myself, and to others. Thinking about what it means to be valued by others, to respect and love and befriend. What am I willing to sacrifice for love?

I imagine that in the past, people tried harder at relationships, although I have little evidence for this, except that the penalties for failure were higher back then. I don’t know that I’d be willing to try as hard as my parents did, at the outset of their relationship. I know few women, certainly, who would do something so risky and foolhardy as my mother did, embarking on a headlong, lifelong love at the age of seventeen and a half.

So, answer yourself this: What do you want from a romantic relationship? What are you willing to sacrifice for someone else’s love and happiness? What won’t you give up? What would make you abandon an otherwise healthy relationship?

I overthink everything.

I wonder if I will ever experience clarity of purpose in the way that I imagine my parents did, back in the day, casting aside doubts and leaping forward. Weighing options and making a decision and not looking back too much, knowing that the decision was made. I wonder if the 21st century will have any certainty– Dubya, with his moral clarity, certainly seems like a throwback to an earlier era (even to those who approve of it!).

Herd Behavior

A memo from Steve Ballmer outlining the challenges to his company from open source software, and Linux in particular, was responsible for driving down the stock today. “We need to woo young programmers away from Linux” said the memo, which was quoted in financial television. Then the reporter said, “Linux stock is up fifty percent this morning” and showed a chart in which LNUX had, indeed, risen. Linux is not a company. VA Software, the company that trades under the symbol LNUX, is a Linux software vendor, but that’s not at all the same thing, in fact its business is less and less related to the operating system, given that it’s changed its name from “VA Linux.” Stupid investors.