Also, your complaint is off-topic

Michael Meeks has a blog. He’s affiliated with SUSE in one way or another. So his RSS feed is picked up by Planet SUSE. All well and good, but what if his content isn’t really on-topic for the aggregation, which is mostly software-oriented? Or, for example, me. I have a blog and it’s picked up by an internal Novell employees aggregation, but my posts have NOTHING to do with work. The whole point, for me, of getting a non-work blog was posting non-work-related stuff on it.

I don’t think Michael signed up for Planet SUSE– I think they just added him, as he invites anyone to do by posting an RSS feed. I certainly didn’t request to be on Planet Novell (not that I mind, but I didn’t agree to any terms or anything). Unless someone signs up promises a particular sort of content, there’s no good reason to demand that they produce it. If my RSS feed is off-topic for your aggregator, then don’t carry my RSS feed, or ask politely for me to split out the topics into two feeds, one for tech and one for everything else, like John Fleck has done, after getting too many complaints about his content from Planet GNOME.

Honestly though, nbody promised you a perfect walled garden of on-topic content. Don’t like it? Don’t read it. Also, your discussion of topicality should be taken elsewhere, since it’s not on-topic for this site.

Personal Essay: Difficult Movies, Hard Thinking, And Donnie Darko

Not too long ago, I loved difficult movies in the same way that I loved difficult novels. Not because they were obscure or hard to understand, but because they grappled with issues I thought were important: the nature of reality, love, death, pain, freedom. If it didn’t require at least a little effort on the part of the viewer or reader to engage, I didn’t think it was worth anyone’s time, and especially not my time. I mocked people who thought that movies should be popcorn fare, full of explosions and happy endings, who wanted mere entertainment. Film, I insisted, could and should be an art form. Anything less was trash, and people who enjoyed it uncritically were philistines.

More recently I’ve been avoiding movies altogether. I won’t watch the bad ones, but I won’t watch the good ones either. And not just movies: I’ve avoided novels, even full-length nonfiction, and read more magazines and blogs, especially those about abstractions, humor, economics, or design. I still disdain escapist novels and movies, but I’ve been avoiding the intellectual and emotional effort required to engage in a more serious work of art as well. After I saw “Lost in Translation” I felt hollowed out inside; although the movie was excellent, I don’t often have the emotional energy to engage with something difficult in the way that I used to.

Then, Sunday night, I finally saw Donnie Darko, and it was exactly the sort of movie I’d been avoiding: a dark and confusing portrayal of a young man slipping into paranoid delusions. The protagonist, Donnie, has no truly coherent world, only these shards of experience that he can’t quite put together. The adults around him have assembled their world-views, and stick to them: the unsympathetic teacher with her psychobabble, the father with his conservative politics… None of those world-views are entirely accurate, and Donnie’s presence often unsettles others, who are suddenly aware of the flaws in their own conceptions of themselves and their worlds.

But of course, having a consistent and comprehensible reality is a key part of being an adult. You build yourself a coherent, self-reinforcing ideology and world-view and you live in it like a shell. The sun rises every day. My political party is the better one. My nation is great, despite its flaws. I love my family. My work matters. I am not a soulless automaton.

Donnie has none of that, but he tries to build one– the problem being that he’s got to analyze every bit of reality and weigh its meaning. When two pieces fit together, it’s a sign, not a coincidence. If someone mentions that “cellar door” is a beautiful phrase, then something important will happen near a cellar door. I’ve felt that way, although not to the psychotic hallucinatory extent Donnie does: There’s a meaning in this, there’s poetry in this, there’s something here that needs to be examined. The examined life is quite tiring. Learning means, in many ways, learning what is not worth examining, and then passing it by. The poet, the artist, the philosopher, and the paranoid schizophrenic have in common that they refuse to ignore certain things, and instead find great meaning in them. It’s hard work, though.

When I was in high school, I took classes where I read Shakespeare, Aristotle, Unamuno, Garcia Marquez, and Tolstoy, and spent my days in this fog of analysis. We had a visitor one day, a former star pupil, who had graduated from college and was working in a law firm, and who said he just didn’t do much of the deep thinking and reading we were doing in our class: it was just too hard, and offered too little reward. I thought he was a fool, but I’m doing the same thing now.

That is, I’ve built myself a shell and kept out confusion and poetry because it’s too hard to deal with. I’ve been trying not to think, because it’s easier that way. And not just a little easier– look at what happens to Donnie.

As I got out of high school and really began to understand what it was to live in my head, and how I could grow up to be a functional human being instead of just stumbling around with my emotional entrails in my hands, I said to myself and to anyone who would listen: “I never want to go back to that. I never want to do that again. I will not do it.” So, I built my shell. I detached myself from experience as much as possible.

I mean, sure, nobody actually wants to feel bad. Neque porro quisquam est qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, as the ancients said. But at what point does pain avoidance become cowardice?

It did, I think, at some point along the line. And now, here I am. Self-satisfied, twenty-seven, making fun of people with squalling, chubby brats at the next table, trying to dress like the boss. I imagine that for most people, there’s an exterior shell and there’s someone else inside. And I guess that I’ve got someone in here, somewhere, as well. But I’ve put so much into that shell, I’ve tried to become it. I’ve committed intellectual, artistic, emotional suicide. I’ve taken the easy way out.

We are the hollow men,
We are the stuffed men,
Leaning together
Headpiece filled with straw.

Naming, Branding, Marketing

Did I mention the KFC article? Well, read it. It’s good. It makes me think about the job of marketing, of presenting. Kitchen Fresh Marketing. Now that I’m being absorbed by marketing, I wonder sometimes if I’m going to turn into one of those pointy-haired bosses.

I’m certainly working on it. My reading list now includes things like “Positioning” and “The Product Manager’s Handbook.” I’ve started wearing shirts with collars to work. I’ve taken out my earrings. I’m going to go get a haircut during lunch, too.

Hippies sell out. Punks just grow up eventually. Not sure what I was when I was younger, aside from a bitter, self-absorbed, teenager. But I guess I’m growing up into a bitter, self-absorbed adult. Totally different kind of bitter and self absorbed of course. But nonetheless… it might be time to read Nick Baker’s “The Mezzanine” again.

Logic, logic, logic

The rightist wingnuts over at the American Family Association, are not known for logic, but their latest campaign is a real winner: trying to stop the USPTO from recognizing a trademark for the French Connection UK acronym. They seem to think that if it’s not a recognized trademark, it won’t appear on clothing or advertising, despite the fact that it’s been in both for quite some time now.

It’s a stupid ad campaign with a juvenile appeal, and the clothes aren’t both ugly and poorly made, but why on earth it should be denied trademark protection, and why the lack of trademark protection would stop them in their tracks escapes me.

Drugs

So are popular products like Prozac, Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax, and Celexa best understood as drugs that change us or as medicines that cure us? What makes them one or the other, beyond social convention and a doctor’s prescription?

Nothing.

Within twelve hours of a missed dose, the patient experiences headache and nausea, progressing to irritability, then ringing in the ears, a tingling sensation in the extremities and scalp, dizziness, diarrhea, violent mood swings, and… well, I don’t know. Probably after a day or three it goes away and you’re back to normal, whatever normal is.

Anger

I get angry when I have to stand by and see things I don’t like happening. This means seeing people make bad decisions, or making fun of my friends, or drinking too much, or lie to be popular. I think this accounts for my dislike of the Ben Stiller, Jerry Sienfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm mode of comedy. It also accounts for my anger at politicians and at the Average American Consumer who has racked up too much debt for no good reason, and at myself when I make stupid decisions, especially when I know they’re stupid well in advance (“Hey, I think I’ll drink too much tonight, and then spend the weekend sulking instead of doing anything worthwhile, and then on Monday feel like I’m wasting my life!”)

So, there is plenty of anger in my life. I’m trying to let that go.